For builders shipping with AI agents

Your coding agent never asks what you meant. It ships the guess.

Send the ticket you are about to hand Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor. I hand back a packet with every unknown labeled instead of invented. Repo facts I cannot know return as numbered fills addressed to you. One test that can actually go red. Rollback written. Readiness scored out of ten.

Start the audit — $250 Read the complete sample Back inside 48 hours

Complete the form, then continue to secure Stripe checkout.

Illustration · synthetic example, not a client ticket
// the ticket
“Add a match score to each result so people know how relevant it is.
Show it as a percentage on the card.”

// what the agent invents
score = (titleHits * 2 + tagHits) / totalTerms * 100

// failure class #2 — the undefined number
No formula was supplied. “87% match” looks authoritative while meaning nothing.

FILL 03 — match-score formula and what counts as zero. Owner: you.
RED TEST — score.formula.spec: zero subject overlap MUST score 0.
The method

Four failures that survive a normal read.

Typos die in review. These produce a system that works exactly as written while failing at the thing it exists to do.

01

The self-contradiction

Two requirements cannot both hold, so the agent silently chooses which one wins.

“Users can request erasure” + “the audit log stays intact.”
02

The undefined number

A score, threshold, or percentage arrives without a formula. The agent invents authoritative-looking math.

“Confidence: 87%.” From where? What counts as zero?
03

The unfalsifiable criterion

“The feature works” can fail on nothing, so nothing catches it being wrong.

Every criterion becomes a named test that can go red.
04

The self-reported control

A status field claims safety or readiness with no runnable check behind it.

A claim with no check scores zero.
What comes back

One packet. Every unknown visible.

A numbered fill addressed to you is the product working. An unlabeled assumption is the product failing.

01

Exposure first

Money, authentication, ownership, live ledgers, and irreversible paths are named at the top.

02

The ordered split

If the ticket is a program, it returns as ordered packets—not several hidden builds.

03

Numbered fills

Unknown repository facts point to you. They never get filled from memory.

04

Failure-class hunt

All four classes are hunted by name and resolved inside the packet.

05

A red-test specification

The exact command is included when your ticket supplies the runner. Unknown commands become fills.

06

Rollback and score

Rollback is written before work starts. Readiness returns NOT READY for you to flip.

Included

  • One intended change or engineering ticket
  • Pre-checkout summary up to 200 words
  • Full ticket up to 1,500 words after payment confirmation
  • One hardened Markdown packet inside 48 hours
  • Exposure call, ordered split, named fills, failure-class hunt, red-test specification, rollback, and readiness score
  • One revision for an unlabeled assumption within seven days

Not included

  • Code written or patches applied
  • Full-repository review
  • Security, legal, or compliance certification
  • Production access, credentials, private keys, or customer data—never send these
  • A multi-system program receives an ordered split, not several finished packets
One free revision. Seven days.
A numbered fill addressed to you is the product working. An unlabeled assumption is the product failing. If I leave one unlabeled, send it back inside seven days and I revise it once at no charge.

Start your Task Packet Audit

Send a summary up to 200 words before Stripe opens. The full ticket comes by email reply after payment confirmation. Payment is confirmed only by Stripe's signed webhook—never by a browser redirect.

Never paste credentials, keys, or customer data. 0 / 200 words

Complete the form, then continue to secure Stripe checkout.

I take up to two audits a week.

Who this is for

A narrow service for a consequential ticket.

Send a ticket if

  • You ship with Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor most days
  • Your agent has handed you work that passed review and was wrong
  • The next ticket touches money, authentication, or ownership
  • You are one person, or two, with nobody to review you

Skip this if

  • You want someone to write the code
  • You want a strategy call about your company
  • Your ticket is a one-line copy change
  • You need it back today—the turnaround is 48 hours
Straight answers

Know what you are buying.

What do you need from me?

Before checkout, send a summary up to 200 words. After payment confirmation, reply to my email with the full ticket up to 1,500 words. Scrub credentials, keys, and customer data first.

Do you need to see my code?

No. Repository facts return as numbered fills addressed to you. A labeled fill you complete from live files is the opposite of a guess your agent buried in a migration.

Why does it come back NOT READY?

A reviewer who marks their own work ready is the same failure as a system that reports its own compliance. You are the approver. I am not, and neither is the agent.

Who writes it?

I do, by hand. Good Love Mind advises the work; it does not run it for me.

What if I want this every week?

Reply to your packet and ask. Standing arrangements exist; I would rather quote one after seeing your first ticket than price it blind.

One offer · one price

Harden the ticket before the agent ships the guess.

One consequential ticket. Every unknown visible. One packet back inside 48 hours.

Start the audit — $250
$25048H TURNAROUND
Start the audit — $250